Author: KickingK
Date: Tuesday December 09th, 2025
File under: Did nobody read the script?
Whilst this is based on 'true events' I can't judge the veracity of the story or the characters of the people it's portraying. I can only judge it as a film. And quite simply, this is one of the most misjudged films I've ever seen. Most of the film has the tone of a regular domestic drama, of a man making poor life choices and then learning to deal with the consequences.
But these are not poor choices, they are the work of a borderline psychopath. A serial, compulsive, inveterate liar who's selfishness wrecks the lives of just about every person who he comes in to contact with.
You can gloss over the traumatising effects of armed robbery in a film if you make it slapstick enough, and that's clearly the memo that Peter Dinklage got, as he plays his character superbly as a panto villain.
But you can't gloss over inveigling your way into a divorcees life by spying on her and then ingratiating yourself with her teenage daughters by lavishing them with gifts. Which you've stolen. These scenes are played first as a rom-com meet-cute and then as a heartwarming family drama. I watched the whole thing through gritted teeth, dumbstruck that nobody seemed to have realised that this constitutes sexual assault.
The film does show the character coming to terms with what he's done and the harm he's caused. But by failing to honestly portray the pathological behaviour needed to get to that point, that realisation comes across as self-serving and self-pitying.
Absolutely baffling how this got made.
Poster Credit Where to Watch
Author: KickingK
Date: Saturday December 06th, 2025
He's a lumberjack and he's ok
This film is a curious mix of artifice and naturalism. On the one hand, the natural lighting of the American landscape is down to earth and gritty. But we're so used to unnatural lighting in films that it invites us to think about the production. The use of the 3:2 aspect ratio literally puts a frame around the screen, also reminding you of the artifice and craft involved.
The camera work switches modes depending on the moment, sometimes staying still for an entire scene, sometimes locking to the character and moving the world around them. It all works well and it's always engaging and effective. But sadly the story or characters didn't draw me in enough to land with me.
The film puts a lot of effort into portraying Joel Edgerton's logger as a decent and kind every-man and completely succeeds, but he's just not interesting. Every aspect of his personality is almost entirely sanded off until the only thing we can really say about him is that he's a hard worker and quietly spoken.
None of the other characters that he meets throughout his life pique much interest as most of the dialogue is theatrical and staged. Each character espousing their opinions at each other, none of it ever connecting with each other or with the viewer.
The worst aspect is the music which is just awful. Plinky-plonk pianos play wistfully, alluding to a tune, alluding to emotion, alluding to meaning but never actually generating any. It's the film soundtrack equivalent of a Coldplay or U2 record. A well crafted shell that sounds important but offers nothing.
Which is a slightly mean way to describe this film. The expanse of the landscape, the length of the time-frame and the philosophising of the script allude to a meaning that the plot and characters simply can't provide.
It's worth a watch for the beautifully shot American forests but nothing more.
Poster Credit Where to Watch
Tags: blog, film, drama, 2025, essential
Author: KickingK
Date: Thursday December 04th, 2025
Joyful and Triumphant
A new film from Shih-Ching Tsou and Sean Baker is always a highlight of the year.
Whilst their recent films have gradually expanded the narrative aspect, increasing the amount of plot and the runtime, this goes back to basics a little, re-focusing on what they do best.
Which is, quite simply, generate empathy.
We get to spend some time with a small family, moving back to Taipei and trying to make a life for themselves running a small noodle stand. There's nothing extraordinary in the plot to create drama or tension. It's all supplied by the characters and the never ending human ability to generate love and friction out of nothing.
Lord only knows how they manage to do this so effortlessly. It all seems so simple and easy. Like Shih-Ching Tsou just placed a camera and let everything play out. But if it were that simple, literally everyone would be doing it and these kind of films would be ten a penny. Only the incredible rarity of films as effective and moving as this indicates that it's a work of rare talent.
There is one revelation in the film which has already been done so dramatically by a UK soap opera that it's passed into British folklore. Which, admittedly, took me out of the scene and their lives for a moment.
But then at the end of the film, a look is exchanged. Lasting for a fleeting moment, barely more than a few frames, it reduced me to such a blubbering wreck that my mind and my heart are still with them and their beautiful, messy lives, days after the film finished.
Poster Credit Where to Watch
Tags: blog, film, thriller, 2025, essential
Author: KickingK
Date: Sunday November 30th, 2025
Paul Thomas Anderson is an idiot.
Paul Thomas Anderson is an idiot. What the hell is he thinking? This film is two hours and forty two minutes long. It should be slow and languid, allowing the characters to slowly chew over the themes of the film with endless expositionary dialogue.
Instead, this film starts at rocket speed, the opening salvo is an entire two hour long movie edited into thirty minutes. Come along, keep up, chop-chop.
After that, it only slightly lessens the pace. The next two and a bit hours, effectively being one extended chase sequence, manages to pack in more ideas than most multi-series tv epics.
If PTA wanted to make money, he'd split this up into one hours episodes, show every single story thread to it's conclusion and get Amazon/Netflix/HBO to pay umpty-million dollars per episode for five series at ten episodes a pop.
What an idiot.
Thankfully PTA's poor financial decision making has gifted us with an absolute banger of a movie.
After his radical activism past finally catches up with him, Bob (played by DiCaprio) is separated from his daughter, Willa (played by Chase Infiniti), and spends the rest of the film desperately trying to catch up with her. Fair play to Leo, he's taken on a role here where he's very much not the hero. Hell, he's not even the main character. Instead, much of the film is spent following him as the main story happens around him. Bob is persistent but does nothing to affect the plot.
Instead, the film is very clear on who and what is making things happen as a wildly antagonistic ecosystem of interests battle each other out. From the militarised police/immigration control to the left-wing, pro-community organisers to the wealthy elite that own the industries that employ the immigrants and benefit from both sides. It's tempting to say that we see this escalating battle play out through Bob's eyes but he's mostly oblivious to it, focusing entirely on keeping his own shit together and finding his daughter.
There's no question as to who the true hero's of the movie are: All the regular people who take the time to help Bob and Willa. Highly organised, highly motivated and fighting tooth and nail, risking everything to help out people they don't even know for no more reason than they're on the same side. Benicio Del Toro turns up in a minor cameo role and nearly steals the film. Without wishing to belabour the point, if PTA was after the money, there's a whole spin off series right there.
The breadth of the political vista on display here is breathtaking. It's a breakneck tour of the sharp end of the US immigration 'debate' and its consequences.
Another notable thing about this movie is its depiction of the police and the elites that control them. Make them too dangerous and they can become exciting and a little bit sexy. But lean too heavily into mockery and you can lessen their danger to ordinary people and the fear they can inspire. This film walks the line between the two perfectly.
Wonderfully, we get to see the things they love about themselves subtly used against them. They think they're cool, heroic and suave, better than the 'wetbacks' they're brutalising. But the reality is the very symbols of their power and masculinity are silly, preposterous and insecure. "Why is your shirt so tight?" should go down as one of the truly great pieces of movie dialogue.
And finally, I loved the way the character of Willa is treated. She's never victimised by the film, even though she's the only character who has had no say in the unfolding events. It's really quite something to see such a profound character arc in a character who has almost no agency.
Like I said at the start, Paul Thomas Anderson is a genius.
Poster Credit Where to Watch
Tags: blog, film, comedy, 2025, essential
Author: KickingK
Date: Saturday November 29th, 2025
The trying is the point
First of all, let's get this out the way: it's a Spinal Tap movie. The jokes are amazing. Wallace & Gromit no longer have the best cheese related jokes.
But the biggest joy of the movie is in watching three old guys heal their friendship.
When we meet them at the start of this new film, they've been separated for a long time. Each has poured their energy into new obsessions. Nigel sells cheese and/or guitars, David writes muzak and Derek runs a glue museum. All of them are a little reluctant to get back together, fearing their past divisions are insurmountable.
But as soon as they start making music together, they begin to find some common ground, as well as some new arguments. An early cameo by Paul McCartney should be revoltingly cringe but the way they tentatively jam together is so earnest and collaborative that it becomes beautiful. They're not good, that's not the point. Four old guys, fumbling around, trying to find a musical relationship together doesn't make great art. But it's the trying that's the point.
A later cameo by Elton John is equally wonderful as by now, with a lot of practice and a full band behind them, they're much more together, much more in sync. A lesser film would have shown this progress as a montage but Spinal Tap II shows the arguments and pettiness and effort needed to improve. They're still not good, after all they're still Spinal Tap, but it's the trying that's the point.
The thing we learn through the film is that they can’t express their friendship or resolve their differences in words. Conversations that attempt to address the situation are clumsy and a failure. Nigel tries to write a song about it, the earnestness of it contrasting hilariously with it’s awfulness. Obviously, the moment they do try to resolve things with words, in true Spinal Tap fashion, it's howlingly funny.
But in playing together they find something that none of them can get elsewhere. The shared goal, the shared effort, the sharing in and of itself.
Not only is this a great sequel, but it adds a new dimension to the original. What we're left with is a pair of films about male friendship. About a bunch of mates who gradually come to realise that, whilst they can't explain why or how, they all need that friendship in their life and need to put the effort in to try to make it work.
Poster Credit Where to Watch
Tags: blog, film, action, 2025
Author: KickingK
Date: Sunday November 23rd, 2025
Clean up in aisle six
The janitor of a Japanese high school is actually a yakuza assassin sent there to look out for his boss’ daughter. When her dad is killed, she becomes a target, with every other assassin in the area converging on the school to capture her.
Good lord this is bad. The first half of the film is interminable. Actors playing character-less characters monologue their way through scene after tedious scene. A decent script writer would have blitzed through this in ten minutes before getting straight to the action. Sadly, this does not have a decent writer so it takes almost an hour.
But once the action starts it picks up, right? God no. Each assassin turns up, does their bit and is despatched.
There’s no sense of geography, no sense of place, no sense of escalation or threat.
The fight scenes are terrible. Stunt men throw endless haymakers at each other, throwing in the occasional kick, filling up their allotted time before we can move onto to the next bunch of fist-fodder.
The music is some of the worst I’ve ever heard in a film. It’s the same off-the-shelf dramatic music used in cheap-shit reality game-shows, pasted over each scene without care or thought. By the end of the film it had given me a headache.
The single glint of light in the whole film is the first appearance of the Baby Assassins. It’s easy to see why they gave them their own film as, in the staggeringly brief time they’re on screen, they completely sideline the main story.
If you’re a Baby Assassins completist: watch this but skip every scene they’re not in (almost the entire film, basically), you’ll miss nothing.
For everyone else: avoid, avoid, avoid.
Poster Credit Where to Watch
Tags: blog, film, drama, 2025, recommended
Author: KickingK
Date: Saturday November 22nd, 2025
Why So Serious?
A free-spirited, fiercely independent black woman with a sexually promiscuous and lesbian past, with a wealthy husband in a loveless marriage in patriarchal 1950’s England. And when we first meet her at the start of the film she’s contemplating suicide.
That character description of Hedda Gabler, magnificently played by Tessa Thompson, gives you an inkling as to what you’re about to watch.
The film very, very quickly disabuses you of that notion. This is absolutely not that kind of film. And Hedda is not that character.
Movie villains tend to exist in one of three categories: The plotting Machiavellian, the agent of chaos who just wants to ‘watch the world burn’ or the opportunist for whom events spiral out of control.
As the film progresses over the course of a single party, held at their preposterous country mansion, Hedda somehow manages to be all three.
Her character is complicated and not at all straightforward, but still nasty, self destructive, unlikeable and utterly magnetic. A human wrecking ball you can't take your eyes off.
None of the other characters come out of this particularly well either. Only Thea comes away with any sympathy and she’s a complete drip.
The film does an excellent job of portraying the straight-laced, stiff upper lipped puritanism of the fifties and how it melts at first contact with the upper classes attitudes towards, well, literally anything that will get in the way of them getting what they want. This film’s opinion of rich people is as black as a hat and revels in giving them enough rope.
The pleasure in the film is in feeling the revulsion for their actions whilst also enjoying the electric tingle at the shock of it all.
The final shot of the film is one of the best super villain inception moments you’ll ever see. Nia da Costa’s previous work for Marvel implies this is entirely deliberate.
Poster Credit Where to Watch
Author: KickingK
Date: Tuesday November 11th, 2025
Viva Macau
Colin Farrell plays Lord Doyle, a Baccarat player, mired in debt, trying to play himself out of a hole. Fala Chen plays Dao Ming, a hostess and loan shark who helps out addicted gamblers with their short term liquidity problem.
Set in Macau, the scenery and cinematography is stunning. The grandeur of the tackiness, the beauty of the monuments to gaucheness. This films captures the concept of greed better than anything I’ve seen. The gluttony, the hunger, to consume, to win, to ingest, constantly, infinitely, never satisfied, never sated, always chasing, always needing.
Volker Bertelmann's music is terrific. Playful and propulsive. It’s the sound of Satan getting behind you and giving you a shove in the back.
Unfortunately, the film pivots around the relationship between Doyle and Dao Ming. But her character is little more than a thumbnail, a sketch. Her story isn’t fleshed out or explained. So their relationship never makes sense, either financially or emotionally.
Consequently, when the revelation happens, it carries no weight.
If the film had been more of a double hander, focusing equally on Fala Chen and Farrell, it could have worked. But now I’m tilting into reviewing the film I’d wish I’d seen.
The film I actually watched is stunningly presented but missing a core.
One quick coda to this review: I'm really appreciating the extra mile that some film makers are going with their end credits. Both this and the recent Caught Stealing have added small amounts of well thought out animation to the credit reel at the end. Mix in a terrific choice of music and it ends the film on a little flourish. Given the turgid state of tv opening and closing credits, where every show has the exact same lazy formula, it's a little point of differentiation. A nice way to show that a little extra care was taken.
It feels like the end credits have been reclaimed after the Marvel era where they were just a thing that added gaps between the 'to be continued' sections.
Not only that, but in this case, somebody in the crew has clearly watched Medusa Deluxe (otherwise known as the film with the greatest end credit sequence ever1) and thought "We'll have some of that". Cracking stuff.
Poster Credit Where to Watch
1. Seriously, watch Medusa Deluxe, the film is weird and wonderful and the end credits are incredible.
↩
Tags: blog, film, horror, 2025
Author: KickingK
Date: Sunday November 02nd, 2025
The little guy, squeaky voice
After enjoying Bet's direct and in-your-face approach to addressing social issues, here's another example of simply telling your audience how you feel about something.
Focusing on the lives of the patrons of a small queer bar, who find themselves in the midst of an alien invasion of sorts as the local population of cis, straight men find themselves taken over by a parasite that turns them into violent zombies who eat gay and trans people. The film almost literally tells you that Jordan Peterson is a glossy turd turning men into raging neanderthals. Garth Marenghi, eat your heart out.
Lets start with the positives. The lighting technicians absolutely understood the assignment. Despite the lack of budget1 the interior shots always look interesting and arresting. The film has it's own neon-noir style which I loved. It hides the basic set design and really makes the parasite/blood effects pop. The ooze and gloop is really slick and slithery.
And the cast are interesting and their interactions believable. They make the broader social themes relatable on a personal level. There's wit and zing here.
Sadly, it all falls apart with the plot structure. It just doesn't understand how a zombie horror movie should work. It introduces the parasitic element near the start, then spends most of the movie on the casts social life. A character is murdered early on and, seemingly an eternity later, somebody idly wonders where they've been. By the time the film handbrake turns into the zombie-killing section, I'd stopped caring about it and the film didn't put the effort into explaining the sudden shift into (mild) violence and gore.
Which brings me to the 'action' sequences which are just terrible. Managing to be both basic and unclear, nothing has any weight, sense of drama or threat. Bad, bad, bad.
And there's an attempt to add a meta-narrative through the use of found footage and genre aware characters that falls completely flat. To make this kind of thing work you have to really commit to it. But here it's so half hearted and inconsequential that when it does happen it's jarring to the point I was questioning why I was even watching this.
It brings me no pleasure to dunk on such a small budget indie film. Nobody makes this kind of movie without really caring about what they do and that much is clearly evident here. But sadly I though this was really poor.
Weirdly, this kind of genre movie is usually a case of weird and whacky effects and plot elements holding your interest even though it lacks a decent script or acting. But this is almost the reverse. I'd actually be interested if the film makers dropped all the 'genre' elements and just made a straight up kitchen-sink drama.
Poster Credit Where to Watch
1. I actually think this may have had a lower budget than The Paragon. Is it possible to have a budget less than zero?
↩
Tags: blog, film, comedy, action, recommended, 2025
Author: KickingK
Date: Thursday October 30th, 2025
Peachy Keen, Avril Lavigne
Going on holiday is a cliche of British sit-coms. Once the show has reached a peak of popularity, the time is ripe to cash in and make a movie. This almost always coincides with the show having run out of ideas. The solution: Take the cast abroad. All the characters you love but in a new, exotic, more expensive looking locale. It never works, it's always terrible.
So here's Baby Assassins 3, a series that struggled for ideas in it's second outing and oh look, they're going on holiday!
Except, Oh, the Baby Assassins crew have ideas. Big ones.
This time around, there's a much stronger focus on the action. The comedy is still there, producing laughs on a pretty consistent basis. Chisato and Mahiro are as adorable and goofy as ever. But it doesn't lounge around in their everyday attempts at adulting. Instead, these are the scenes that knits the action together.
And there's a concerted attempt to beef1 up the fight scenes. It's starts off quickly with an absolutely blistering early set piece. It then builds via a burgeoning cast and variety of locations. Well thought out characterisation creates a believably cruel and nasty antagonist, cranking the tension as we get closer to the end.
And when we get there it explodes. There's a sense of real, palpable danger at the heart of the ending. Built up by growing affection for the duo over three whole films, which is then juxtaposed and threatened by a genuinely vicious bastard, the stakes feel real. You care.
The fight choreography is loose and scrappy. But not in the 'Jason Bourne' way of quick editing to hide the fact that these are stunt men instead of highly trained martial artists. Here, the director and fight choreographer trust that their actors are skilled enough to properly go for each other and make it look good on the fly. You can feel the air woosh past you as rapid punches narrowly miss their mark. Ones that do land look like they hurt. It has one of the best depictions of severe concussion I've seen in this genre.
The result is thrilling, exciting, brutal and scary.
Next up, in a reversal of the British sit-com cliche, Baby Assassins Everyday! the tv series. I can't wait.
Poster Credit Where to Watch
1. Spicy Miyazaki beef
↩
Tags: blog, film, comedy, action, 2025, recommended
Author: KickingK
Date: Monday October 27th, 2025
More Babies
The babies are back. This time their inability to manage their finances get’s them suspended from the assassins guild, forcing them to look for alternative forms of employment to pay their bills.
This instalment sticks largely sticks to the same formula as the first one but leans a little more into the comedy. The action scenes are more overtly comedic, a set piece brawl in a bank setting an early inventive tone. Later, a squabble between the pair whilst dressed as fur-suited mascots overspills into a full on fight scene. It’s uproariously funny.
The script writers have clearly realised how well the chemistry between the two teenage slackers works. And so, as antagonists, they get in two more teenage slackers.
The plot, such as it is, is that two wanna-be assassins find out that the only way to get into the assassins guild is if another pair ‘retire’. So they set their sites on Mahiro and Chisato. But they’re both as big a loveable pair of goofballs as the titular assassins, so we end up with double the levels of doofus bickering and teenage awkwardness.
Sadly, the final fight scene follows the same set up as the first film but can’t come close to the same level of intensity. By this point the film has run out of ideas, but the laughs to get us here make it more than worth the while.
Poster Credit Where to Watch
Tags: blog, film, thriller, 2025
Author: KickingK
Date: Monday October 06th, 2025
Caught Napping
It's rare to see a film that manages to add up to so much less than the sum of it's parts. There's nothing here that, taken in isolation, can be criticised. Pick any element of the film: it's fine, good even.
But the actual film as a whole? It's a nothing burger. A standard sized bowl of regular, unflavoured porridge, made with skimmed milk. It made one hour and forty five minutes slide past. I doubt I'll remember any of it by next week.
Poster Credit Where to Watch
Tags: blog, film, thriller, 2025
Author: KickingK
Date: Sunday October 05th, 2025
Not as good as the Wikipedia page
It's a bit unfair to watch this straight after the magnificent Relay, but there you go. This is the story behind the biggest art theft in Irish history, spearheaded by Rose Dugdale, an English woman from an incredibly wealthy background, for the cause of the IRA.
The first mistake the film makes is by spending so much of it's runtime on the heist itself. Stealing stuff is the easy part, the boring part. Anyone can steal something, the trick is to get away with it. Relay doesn't even bother to show the theft, it's already happened before the film even starts.
The problem here is that the main characters don't seem to realise this and their getaway plan is staggeringly dumb, full of holes and badly implemented. It's difficult to empathise with them when they keep making schoolboy errors that we can see coming a mile off.
Which leads to the second mistake the film makes which is to focus on the art theft in the first place. A quick read through Rose Dugdale's Wikipedia entry is jaw dropping. She led a truly extraordinary life which the film shows snapshots of but never enough to show how committed she truly was. You could come away from this film with the idea that she was something of a dilettante, where as I think the the lack of commitment is from the film makers, not Rose.
The film has a lot of interesting ideas and tries to knit everything together in an attempt to create something that's more than the sum of it's parts. The way it uses the artworks themselves to explore aspects of Rose's characters is a good idea. Unfortunately it doesn't use the rest of the script to really dig deep and so everything is little more than a scratch on the surface.
Which is a shame as if anyone's life is interesting enough to make a movie of, it's Rose Dugdale. It's just a shame that this one doesn't do it justice.
Poster Credit Where to Watch
Tags: blog, film, thriller, 2025, essential
Author: KickingK
Date: Saturday October 04th, 2025
Credit or Debit?
Riz Ahmed plays a middle man who works on behalf of whistle blowers and the corporations they've stolen from to ensure that they both get what they want out of a deal.
To do this he uses a relay service for deaf people, typing messages into an old-fashioned computer modem that is then read out by a call centre operative. Nobody hears him speak and the service is untraceable.
So in every tense conversation, every high stakes negotiation, the 'Jason Bourne' character is played by a random call centre person who is literally phoning it in. One staggeringly tense, life or death scene is finished off with a jaunty "Thank you for using the tri-state relay sevice, have a wonderful evening".
This deadpan approach to tension building is carried over to much of the rest of the film. Outside of the occasional (and decent) needle-drop the soundtrack is barely noticeable. The cinematography is restrained and un-showy, not a single trace of camera shake. The acting is similarly pared down, Riz Ahmed has about two lines of dialogue in the entire first third of the film.
This is a film that lets the plot and the characters drive the tension. And boy is this film tense. It starts at a level of 'gripping the arms of the sofa', rapidly escalates to 'fitness tracker heart-rate warning' before gradually climaxing to 'choking claustrophobia'.
Like director David Mackenzie's previous film, Hell or High Water, Relay draws from the real-world effects of late-stage capitalism to bury it's characters in impossible choices. There's no 'good guys', just people trying not to drown. There are antagonists, but the real villains are out of site, everywhere and nowhere at the same time. Untouchable but inescapable. As the 'heist' begins to fall apart in the latter stages of the film, there's a growing realisation that there's no way to not lose this game. Even if you win, it'll cost you your soul. A single answer phone message breaks your heart and you know the game is rigged every single way.
This film stands along side the previously mentioned Hell or High Water and the more recent How to Blow Up a Pipeline at the absolute pinnacle of the modern heist movie genre.
Poster Credit Where to Watch
Tags: blog, film, drama, 2025, essential
Author: KickingK
Date: Thursday September 25th, 2025
Yes it really, really, really could 'appen
It's often forgotten, but you have to go through an awful lot of Shawshank before you get to the Redemption. It's A Wonderful Life is mostly a film about a man being driven to suicide.
Much of writer/director Andrea Arnold's Bird is similarly difficult to watch. More so as the lead character, Bailey, is a twelve year old girl. Watching her living in such poverty and squalor, lacking any real control over anything in her life is painful. It's heightened, at least for me, by the fact that this is filmed a stones throw1 from where I live. I know areas like this. I know kids like this.
Writer/director Andrea Arnold manages to make this coming of age tale watchable by crafting something that is supremely beautiful, where hope is everywhere when you look for it. Growing in the cracks in the broken pavement, scrawled on the walls of a piss-stained stairwell, in the scavenging eyes of an urban fox. Even, and I can't believe I'm going to write this, in the lyrics of a Verve record.
Hope is a gradual, building constant in this film. When everything gets too much and threatens to crush and overwhelm Bailey, the film breaks it's own narrative constraints in order to make the point that there's still hope. Still a way for things to be better, still a way to see beauty everywhere.
So when that hope builds to the point of a crashing wave, it hit's like a tidal wave of joy and grief and love.
Out of the movies of the past few years, only Aftersun has had an ending that hit's as hard as this. A masterpiece.
A bloody masterpiece.
Poster Credit Where to Watch
1. Well, a short swim.
↩
Tags: blog, film, comedy, sci-fi, 2025
Author: KickingK
Date: Sunday September 21st, 2025
I am a Hyper Dimensional Being
Dutch seeks to learn the secrets of Psyonic power, in order to seek out the perpetrator of a hit and run that left him partially crippled.
This is almost-zero budget fantasy/sci-fi movie is a lot of fun. Especially if you enjoy dialogue like "We are seekers, from another plain of existance", delivered earnestly. The whole thing is just the right amount of silly whilst still having a message of reconciliation that hits just the right spot. There's also a nice little commentary of the corruption of power and absolute power as well.
Everybody involved in this understood the assignment. Especially Florence Noble, who plays her character exactly like the thespians who play guest characters in early Red Dwarf. Dead straight, let the audience enjoy the absurdity for themselves.
Add a 'recommended star' to the top there if you love eighties synthwave. The soundtrack is an absolute banger.
Poster Credit Where to Watch
Tags: blog, film, comedy, 2025, recommended
Author: KickingK
Date: Saturday September 20th, 2025
Aunt, A u n t
This film: It doesn’t know what it wants to say, doesn’t say much of it, and even that it doesn’t say with it’s whole chest. This should be terrible and I can imagine some people bouncing off this completely.
But I still recommend it because it has a sense of freedom. Like everyone has a bunch of ideas that sound interesting so have a go at making them work. See what’ll happen.
Take for instance Margaret Qualley’s lead character, Honey O’Donahue, who is simultaneously both the hardboiled gumshoe and the femme fatale. Does it work? Absolutely! She’s magnificent, ably abetted by a Barbarella paced series of costume changes, every single one of which is just *chef’s kiss*.
But also only kind of. The plot kind of burbles along, things happen which criss-cross the paths of the ensemble cast, but nothing drives it. So even though she’s magnificent, she doesn’t get to do much of significance.
Every character has that kind of twist to it. What if we took that character from film noir but played it like this instead. The whole cast is great, but special mention goes to Charlie Day who plays the archetypal sexist, incompetent police detective who makes the P.I.’s life difficult. Except he only hits on her because he knows she get’s a kick out of knocking him back; knows full damn well she’s better at the job than he is so keeps giving her leads; and is only a pain in the ass when he really needs to be sure that something’s going to stick.
It’s fun. It’s funny.
The whole thing wraps up in less than ninety minutes and doesn’t amount to much. I really wanted more from it. But, having said that, I would love to watch another ninety minutes of these characters.
Poster Credit Where to Watch
Tags: blog, film, horror, 2025
Author: KickingK
Date: Saturday September 13th, 2025
Well Weapon
Sometimes I think I just have to accept a film isn't made for me. The premise of Weapons, revealed in the trailer and, admirably, laid out within the first few minutes of the film, is that one night, at the exact same time, seventeen children from the same class at school get out of their beds and run away, never to be seen again. Only one boy from the class is left.
The implications are obvious: as inconceivable as those events are, it's equally inconceivable that the classes teacher, Justine, doesn't know something about it. Her class is the only thing connecting all those kids.
And so, in the absence of literally anything in the way of explanation or closure, the parents start to lash out, at the school and at Justine. It's an excellent premise: what happens to a town when an inexplicable tragedy occurs? How do they cope with that? It's a perfect theme for horror stories to explore.
Sadly for me, the film isn't interested in exploring those ramifications at all. It does just enough to make a juicy set up, full of tension, and then instead starts to focus on what actually happened that night.
It does a pretty good job of that. It utilises a structure that keeps switching the character that we're following. Building tension to breaking point with one character before switching to another. Releasing the tension a little before building it right back up again and repeating the process.
The sense of dread is palpable, the jump scares are well done and used sparingly, the violence is shocking and gruesome. Everything works really well...until it doesn't.
After a few time-line switches, we start to receive diminishing returns. As the characters get more and more peripheral, it starts to get frustrating. Instead of advancing the plot we're now following characters who matter less and less to the story. One character could be cut completely and it wouldn't make any difference.
When we eventually do snap back to the core characters it's run out of steam and worse, stops making sense. It turns out that what happened that night isn't all that interesting.
Or at least to me. See, I wanted to watch the film that the opening implied we were going to get. I wanted to watch a film about a small town tearing itself apart with grief and suspicion. I wanted to watch a horror with subtext, that gets under your skin and questions your relationships with your community.
What I actually watched was a reasonably well done, gruesome horror story about magic and scary kids1. It wasn't for me.
Poster Credit Where to Watch
1. VERY MINOR SPOILER: If you find kids scary that is. I, for the record, do not. Which meant that the ending was howlingly funny. My wife and I disagreed with the intentionality of this. She thought it was supposed to be funny, I thought it was inadvertent. It's certainly memorable, I'll give it that.
↩
Tags: blog, film, action, 2025
Author: KickingK
Date: Thursday September 11th, 2025
And figured this out and no one gets hurt
The first film is a pretty ropey film with some decently violent fight scenes that really explodes at the end into an orgy of Looney Tunes scale ultra violence. John Wick re-written by Rick Mayall and Adrian Edmondson. The surprise of the sheer scale and glee of that final fight glossed over how threadbare the rest of the film was.
The second film is pretty much exactly the same except it’s on holiday and the final fight is rubbish. Everything is sign posted, nothing is a surprise. No wit, no style, no panache.
Celebrity guest cameos:
- RZA’s does his watered down Ghost Dog impression. He’s decent again.
- Sharon Stone doesn’t so much chew the scenery as rip it to pieces with her bare teeth. Sadly, the script is dull and lifeless and she’s wasted.
- Christopher Lloyd turns up. He doesn’t do anything, at all, but he does turn up.
- The dog gets the best laughs of the film but is only in it for a minute.
On the plus side, it’s only 90 minutes long, doesn’t outstay its welcome and clips along at such a brisk pace that it’s never boring. But I kind of feel like that’s the bare minimum for an action movie. It’s like praising a pop song for having a catchy tune. Yes, that’s the point. You’ve done the absolute bare minimum that’s expected of you, now what?
In Nobody 2’s case: absolutely nothing.
Poster Credit Where to Watch
Tags: blog, film, action, 2025
Author: KickingK
Date: Sunday September 07th, 2025
And a re-al hero...
Edith Meanie is pulled back to do one last job after her ex-boyfriend messes with the mob.
It’s not an original set up but the execution is superb. Your immersion in the film rests entirely on the shoulders of Samara Weaving and Karl Glusman, their relationship being the thing that the entire film revolves around. And they pull it off superbly. John is an entirely believable fuck up who, infuriatingly, takes the wrong choice in every single moment, but never-the-less is also believably endearing. And Meanie is an entirely believable smart-but-not-educated ex-con trying to go straight who can’t ignore her affections and sense of duty.
The film builds it’s plots, characters and sub-plots convincingly and entertainingly, as it crescendoes to the big heist and final car chase and then…
…kind of just fizzles out.
That final car chase, the escape from the scene of the crime, is a bit limp. It’s not bad but the chase at the start of the film is a lot better. It’s just very underwhelming considering the excitement the film built up in the lead up to it.
Worse still, the film decides to throw in some crime drama plot twists that suddenly gets really, really dark. Pitch black in fact. But the film hasn’t earned that tonal shift because it’s put all its effort into a big car chase inside a casino and jokes about running someone over in a Tesla. It just happens out of nowhere, without the character work to make it believable.
So in the end we end up with a film that neither works as a car chase action movie nor as a complex crime drama of loyalty and betrayal. The two things end up tripping each other up.
